Reply To: Sec 8 sub sec12 Imperial appliction Act.

Welcome Forums General Sec 8 sub sec12 Imperial appliction Act. Reply To: Sec 8 sub sec12 Imperial appliction Act.

#2341
Derby
Participant

Yes, both the Magistrate and the Supreme court judge erred. But the case as argued by the appellant was skirting around the edge of a proper defence and in fact as a review should have been heard by a minimum of 2 Justices. Only a couple of years prior the Attorney General changed the rules giving one Justice jurisdiction. The Imperial Acts Application Act 1980 is not a Political document it is transcribed law which must be given full faith and credit via section 118 and 51(xxv) Commonwealth Constitution. The Infringement Act has not followed proper due process to become a law as Parliament has no authority to pass a law which brings section 16 of the Constitution Act 1975 into disrepute. If I was the appellant I would charge the Parliament of Victoria with theft and include the Supreme court and Magistrates court justices with aiding and abetting.